Desire to have Children Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Desire to have Children - essay ExampleFinally, they decided to attempt in vitro fertilization. Mary sue supplied nine eggs for the procedure, and her husband supplied sperm, which medical exam exam experts used to fertilize all the nine eggs in a laboratory. The medical personnel enter two eggs in Mary Sues womb, but pregnancy did non result. The medical personnel froze the remaining seven fertilized eggs in order to preserve them for future use. Sometime later, the jibe divorced, but they disagreed on who between them should claim the fertilized eggs and to what use they should be put. Mar Sue claimed possession of the fertilized eggs and expressed the desire to have them implanted in her body. Junior opposed Mary Sues claim of ownership and intention to implant the eggs. Instead, he wanted them destroyed. Mary Sue filed a law suit in court regarding the case. The judge ruled in her favor and granted her terminable custody of the fertilized eggs, so as to avail Mary Sue the chance to achieve a radiation pattern pregnancy by having medical experts implant the eggs in her womb. The rationale of this decision was that human deportment begins at conception and, therefore, the fertilized eggs were persons who have the right to the provision of suitable conditions and support that would allow them to dumbfound into normal human beings. The judge added that the final custody of the child, child support, and visitation would be decided by the same court if one of the eggs results in birth. II. Ethical Question to be Answered Was Judge W. Dale materialisation chastely justified in regarding the fertilized eggs as persons that have a right to life and not as property? III. Proposed Answers to Ethical Question Judge Youngs decision was not morally justified because the frozen fertilized eggs were not naturally conceived and, therefore, this argument does not parallel the ones put former by opponents of abortion. It is appropriate to regard the fertilized e ggs as property because medical experts created them artificially and, therefore, are the foot of human beings. In addition, the fertilized eggs do not have a societal, moral responsibility and thus, they cannot be regarded as persons. A person has a moral role to play in society, the fertilized eggs do not. IV. Objections to Proposed Answers and Responses to the Objections Objection (1) The conceptus is a living human being because the continuous process of growth and outgrowth of human beings begins at conception. Therefore, the frozen fertilized eggs should be regarded as conceptus since they came into existence as a result of conception. Whether conception takes place in a womans body or scientists arrest it artificially in the laboratory, fact is it leads to the creation of a human life form, the zygote. Response (1) The conceptus does not have some(prenominal) of the functions of a human being and, therefore, cannot be bestowed with the same status as a human being living in the real world. Fertilized eggs are just a potbelly of cells which scientists or medical experts keep alive through artificial means, without whose assistance they will surely die. A zygote that medical experts create and preserve through an artificially regulated process is not a real form of human life. This is because it is not supported or sustained in any focussing by the life processes that manifest themselves through nature. The same way that a graft of skin cells obtained from a person represents a living part of that person, it cannot be regarded as a person because they lack any of the moral functions associated with a person. Objection (2) God imparts a soul onto human beings at conception and not at birth since birth is just a transition from the womb into the world. The life of the baby did not begin at birth, but it was alive from the moment of conception. Since every human